Personal Responsibility
Monday, October 18, 2010 at 8:06PM There sure is a lot going on right now around book banning and censorship. In fact, it's come to a town near me. San Luis Obispo, a small city about 45 minutes down the Coast Highway from me, reviewed a book today that someone wants taken off high school shelves. Here's the problem: We don't know who. After ten years in the school curriculum, the book was reviewed today as the result of an anonymous complaint.
The book is "Kaffir Boy" by Mark Mathabane, a memoir about survival as a child in South Africa during Apartheid. Some anonymous person is upset by page 72, which contains a fairly graphic description of children prostituting themselves for food.
I have an old friend, Dave Congalton, who's hosted a local talk radio show since...I'm not quite sure, but I think since the beginning of time. He asked me this morning If I'd call in to his show to weigh in on the controversy. And of course I did.
It was quite a spirited discussion.
I made it very clear that I didn't feel any book should ever be reviewed on an anonymous tip. Stand up, show your face. If you think you're right, if you think your position is reasonable, what are you worried about? Well, I got some answers about that from two call-in listeners. They informed me that the person was probably afraid of being "ostracized." That struck me odd, and I said so. To ostracize someone is to banish them, force them out of the group. We don't put people out on ice floes in this society. Exactly how would we force them out, and out of what? I think the honest word here is not ostracize but criticize. The person who wants a book removed from a high school is worried their attempt might be criticized. Yes. It might. But why should that stop you? And in what way is criticism causing you personal damage? Why are we all so afraid of criticism? If we're so sure we're right, what do we lose if someone disagrees?
One caller even likened it to the dangers of saying something about the gay community and then having them rally and form a boycott and put a person out of business.
Okay. Let's stop and examine this. A person wants to say something negative about the gay community. But he's a business owner. And he doesn't want them to stop spending money at his business. So he wants to say it anonymously. You want to take an action. You just don't want a negative consequence to result from that action. But accepting the consequences of your actions is the heart of personal responsibility.
If you're a business owner, watch what you say about your customers. You have a right to say anything you want. But they have a right to shop elsewhere. If you're a parent, and you want a book out of a classroom, stand up, state your name, and explain why. If people vehemently disagree, so be it. Vehement disagreement is the consequence of the book challenger. If you don't want to hear vehement disagreement, don't challenge a book.
To throw the challenge out anonymously is like making a voluntary purchase and then refusing to pay the bill when it comes due.
Catherine
Great news! "Kaffir Boy" will not be banned or abridged in San Luis Obispo! The decision was unanimous.
If you want to feel better about all this, click on the link and read all about it:
Reader Comments (5)
What is interesting to me is that censorship is, at its heart, a form of criticism. So, it's feels a bit hypocritical to me. But I will say this: I'm almost glad to think that the challenger is in a community where you could be ostracized for book banning. That says something positive, doesn't it?
In my opinion, an anonymous challenge shouldn't be considered a challenge at all.
The school policy (and the policy for any library) should make it clear that if one is to issue a challenge to a book it cannot be done anonymously. If you believe in your cause, you must take on the responsibility and the consequences of speaking up. Is it tough to be criticized? Ask any teacher.
One other observation: this is not a challenge. When someone singles out ONE page in a book for something he or she deems objectionable, it smacks of censorship because it is censorship. Look at the recent spate of challenges about SPEAK that focus on the fact that there are teens having sex or that Melinda is raped. They are taking a page or a scene and demonizing the entire book without considering the work as a whole. Is that not like rejecting a Picasso because of one bared breast?
teri
"I want to criticize you, but I don't want you to criticize me." Ah, the double standard that defines our country.
I'm with Brian on this one, it's not a challenge, at all.
It may be easy for me to say since I'm reviewing books on a daily basis and I can't imagine not being able to stand up for what I've felt about a book. I may also be a tad bit more open-minded with my feelings, even more so when it comes to books.
It's a sad state though when you feel like you have to hide from the public and not voice your opinion. I can only imagine whoever this individual is must be incredibly sad and generally angry with the world. The type that likes to complain about the state of politics & government, but refuses to vote because they feel their choices are too poor.
We really do live in a country where you could never truly be completely ostracized and chances are, if you feel one way about something there is most likely another who feels that way too. So make a stand! If they aren't going to they may as well find a less democratic country to live in.